[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfPsq+Bv=nbFtbLyU3=ihEdHhEWpZO+1SEutPz_ByELtw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:39:23 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>,
Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: I2C_HISI should depend on ARCH_HISI && ACPI
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 5:15 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 3:58 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> Please tell me how this driver will be probed when CONFIG_ACPI
> is disabled (it cannot, as nothing instantiates platform devices of the
> right type, so there is no reason to bother the user with a question about
> this driver when configuring his kernel).
Go ahead with it in v2. I'll not block you.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists