linux-kernel - Re: [External] [PATCH v4 5/5] mm/memcg: Improve refill_obj

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:00:21 -0700
From:   Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To:     Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Cc:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>,
        Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
        Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@...il.com>,
        Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [External] [PATCH v4 5/5] mm/memcg: Improve refill_obj_stock() performance

On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 11:07 PM Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 8:01 AM Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > There are two issues with the current refill_obj_stock() code. First of
> > all, when nr_bytes reaches over PAGE_SIZE, it calls drain_obj_stock() to
> > atomically flush out remaining bytes to obj_cgroup, clear cached_objcg
> > and do a obj_cgroup_put(). It is likely that the same obj_cgroup will
> > be used again which leads to another call to drain_obj_stock() and
> > obj_cgroup_get() as well as atomically retrieve the available byte from
> > obj_cgroup. That is costly. Instead, we should just uncharge the excess
> > pages, reduce the stock bytes and be done with it. The drain_obj_stock()
> > function should only be called when obj_cgroup changes.
> >
> > Secondly, when charging an object of size not less than a page in
> > obj_cgroup_charge(), it is possible that the remaining bytes to be
> > refilled to the stock will overflow a page and cause refill_obj_stock()
> > to uncharge 1 page. To avoid the additional uncharge in this case,
> > a new overfill flag is added to refill_obj_stock() which will be set
> > when called from obj_cgroup_charge().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/memcontrol.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index a6dd18f6d8a8..d13961352eef 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -3357,23 +3357,34 @@ static bool obj_stock_flush_required(struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock,
> >         return false;
> >  }
> >
> > -static void refill_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg, unsigned int nr_bytes)
> > +static void refill_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg, unsigned int nr_bytes,
> > +                            bool overfill)
> >  {
> >         unsigned long flags;
> >         struct obj_stock *stock = get_obj_stock(&flags);
> > +       unsigned int nr_pages = 0;
> >
> >         if (stock->cached_objcg != objcg) { /* reset if necessary */
> > -               drain_obj_stock(stock);
> > +               if (stock->cached_objcg)
> > +                       drain_obj_stock(stock);
> >                 obj_cgroup_get(objcg);
> >                 stock->cached_objcg = objcg;
> >                 stock->nr_bytes = atomic_xchg(&objcg->nr_charged_bytes, 0);
> >         }
> >         stock->nr_bytes += nr_bytes;
> >
> > -       if (stock->nr_bytes > PAGE_SIZE)
> > -               drain_obj_stock(stock);
> > +       if (!overfill && (stock->nr_bytes > PAGE_SIZE)) {
> > +               nr_pages = stock->nr_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +               stock->nr_bytes &= (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> > +       }
> >
> >         put_obj_stock(flags);
> > +
> > +       if (nr_pages) {
> > +               rcu_read_lock();
> > +               __memcg_kmem_uncharge(obj_cgroup_memcg(objcg), nr_pages);
> > +               rcu_read_unlock();
> > +       }
>
> It is not safe to call __memcg_kmem_uncharge() under rcu lock
> and without holding a reference to memcg. More details can refer
> to the following link.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210319163821.20704-2-songmuchun@bytedance.com/
>
> In the above patchset, we introduce obj_cgroup_uncharge_pages to
> uncharge some pages from object cgroup. You can use this safe
> API.
>

I would recommend just rebase the patch series over the latest mm tree.