linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] mm/memcg: Move mod_objcg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Apr 2021 11:21:50 -0400
From:   Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>,
        Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
        Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@...il.com>,
        Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] mm/memcg: Move mod_objcg_state() to memcontrol.c

On 4/19/21 11:14 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 08:00:28PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> The mod_objcg_state() function is moved from mm/slab.h to mm/memcontrol.c
>> so that further optimization can be done to it in later patches without
>> exposing unnecessary details to other mm components.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>   mm/memcontrol.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>   mm/slab.h       | 16 ++--------------
>>   2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> index e064ac0d850a..dc9032f28f2e 100644
>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> @@ -3150,6 +3150,19 @@ void __memcg_kmem_uncharge_page(struct page *page, int order)
>>   	css_put(&memcg->css);
>>   }
>>   
>> +void mod_objcg_state(struct obj_cgroup *objcg, struct pglist_data *pgdat,
>> +		     enum node_stat_item idx, int nr)
>> +{
>> +	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
>> +	struct lruvec *lruvec = NULL;
>> +
>> +	rcu_read_lock();
>> +	memcg = obj_cgroup_memcg(objcg);
>> +	lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat);
>> +	mod_memcg_lruvec_state(lruvec, idx, nr);
>> +	rcu_read_unlock();
>> +}
> It would be more naturally placed next to the others, e.g. below
> __mod_lruvec_kmem_state().
>
> But no deal breaker if there isn't another revision.
>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
>
Yes, there will be another revision by rebasing patch series on the 
linux-next. I will move the function then.

Cheers,
Longman