[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4739167e-676b-998c-4565-8aa32a66706f@embeddedor.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:08:49 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Jon Maloy <jmaloy@...hat.com>,
Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND][next] tipc: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
Hi all,
Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 3/5/21 03:25, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
> through to the next case.
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> ---
> net/tipc/link.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c
> index 115109259430..bcc426e16725 100644
> --- a/net/tipc/link.c
> +++ b/net/tipc/link.c
> @@ -649,6 +649,7 @@ int tipc_link_fsm_evt(struct tipc_link *l, int evt)
> break;
> case LINK_FAILOVER_BEGIN_EVT:
> l->state = LINK_FAILINGOVER;
> + break;
> case LINK_FAILURE_EVT:
> case LINK_RESET_EVT:
> case LINK_ESTABLISH_EVT:
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists