[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5047001a-e5a8-ec64-0dc7-662e7cb0d100@embeddedor.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:11:00 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND][next] net: netrom: Fix fall-through warnings for
Clang
Hi all,
Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 3/5/21 03:22, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
> warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of
> letting the code fall through to the next case.
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> ---
> net/netrom/nr_route.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/netrom/nr_route.c b/net/netrom/nr_route.c
> index 78da5eab252a..de9821b6a62a 100644
> --- a/net/netrom/nr_route.c
> +++ b/net/netrom/nr_route.c
> @@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ static int __must_check nr_add_node(ax25_address *nr, const char *mnemonic,
> fallthrough;
> case 2:
> re_sort_routes(nr_node, 0, 1);
> + break;
> case 1:
> break;
> }
> @@ -359,6 +360,7 @@ static int nr_del_node(ax25_address *callsign, ax25_address *neighbour, struct n
> fallthrough;
> case 1:
> nr_node->routes[1] = nr_node->routes[2];
> + break;
> case 2:
> break;
> }
> @@ -482,6 +484,7 @@ static int nr_dec_obs(void)
> fallthrough;
> case 1:
> s->routes[1] = s->routes[2];
> + break;
> case 2:
> break;
> }
> @@ -529,6 +532,7 @@ void nr_rt_device_down(struct net_device *dev)
> fallthrough;
> case 1:
> t->routes[1] = t->routes[2];
> + break;
> case 2:
> break;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists