[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <511007ca-b8d4-239e-b861-3b661035923a@embeddedor.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:17:19 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Chas Williams <3chas3@...il.com>
Cc: linux-atm-general@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 070/141] atm: fore200e: Fix fall-through warnings for
Clang
Hi all,
Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 11/20/20 12:34, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> by explicitly adding a fallthrough pseudo-keyword.
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/atm/fore200e.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/atm/fore200e.c b/drivers/atm/fore200e.c
> index 9a70bee84125..ba3ed1b77bc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/atm/fore200e.c
> +++ b/drivers/atm/fore200e.c
> @@ -423,6 +423,7 @@ fore200e_shutdown(struct fore200e* fore200e)
> /* XXX shouldn't we *start* by deregistering the device? */
> atm_dev_deregister(fore200e->atm_dev);
>
> + fallthrough;
> case FORE200E_STATE_BLANK:
> /* nothing to do for that state */
> break;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists