[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <07757a90-7682-47e4-f6ab-a07b1658280c@embeddedor.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:11:29 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 092/141] libata: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
Hi all,
Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 11/20/20 12:36, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
> through to the next case.
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> index b6f92050e60c..2db1e9c66088 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> @@ -2613,6 +2613,7 @@ int ata_eh_reset(struct ata_link *link, int classify,
> switch (tmp) {
> case -EAGAIN:
> rc = -EAGAIN;
> + break;
> case 0:
> break;
> default:
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists