[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7229aa6e-9943-9568-faf2-7c8cd81e6890@embeddedor.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:23:19 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 051/141] reiserfs: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
Hi all,
Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 11/20/20 12:32, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
> through to the next case.
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> ---
> fs/reiserfs/namei.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/namei.c b/fs/reiserfs/namei.c
> index 1594687582f0..90bb49bfdba0 100644
> --- a/fs/reiserfs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/reiserfs/namei.c
> @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ int search_by_entry_key(struct super_block *sb, const struct cpu_key *key,
> return IO_ERROR;
> }
> PATH_LAST_POSITION(path)--;
> + break;
>
> case ITEM_FOUND:
> break;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists