linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/7] mfd: sec: Simplify getting of_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <64fb91ae-c754-fb25-0ef7-17b2f1b8a1e4@samsung.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Apr 2021 07:25:28 +0200
From:   Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] mfd: sec: Simplify getting of_device_id match data


On 19.04.2021 10:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Use of_device_get_match_data() to make the code slightly smaller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
> ---
>   drivers/mfd/sec-core.c | 9 +++------
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> index 8d55992da19e..3126c39f3203 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>   #include <linux/i2c.h>
>   #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>   #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>   #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>   #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> @@ -324,12 +325,8 @@ static inline unsigned long sec_i2c_get_driver_data(struct i2c_client *i2c,
>   						const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>   {
>   #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> -	if (i2c->dev.of_node) {
> -		const struct of_device_id *match;
> -
> -		match = of_match_node(sec_dt_match, i2c->dev.of_node);
> -		return (unsigned long)match->data;
> -	}
> +	if (i2c->dev.of_node)
> +		return (unsigned long)of_device_get_match_data(&i2c->dev);
>   #endif

Does it make any sense to keep the #ifdef CONFIG_OF after this change? I 
would also skip (i2c->dev.of_node) check, because 
of_device_get_match_data() already does that (although indirectly).

>   	return id->driver_data;
>   }

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland