linux-kernel - [PATCHv3 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move the adreno smmu specific impl earlier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <ecd47256b13adb6c5c32c7597581f436c90f135a.1618898456.git.saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:34:57 +0530
From:   Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Jordan Crouse <jordan@...micpenguin.net>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@...eaurora.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCHv3 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move the adreno smmu specific impl earlier

Adreno(GPU) SMMU and APSS(Application Processor SubSystem) SMMU
both implement "arm,mmu-500" in some QTI SoCs and to run through
adreno smmu specific implementation such as enabling split pagetables
support, we need to match the "qcom,adreno-smmu" compatible first
before apss smmu or else we will be running apps smmu implementation
for adreno smmu and the additional features for adreno smmu is never
set. For ex: we have "qcom,sc7280-smmu-500" compatible for both apps
and adreno smmu implementing "arm,mmu-500", so the adreno smmu
implementation is never reached because the current sequence checks
for apps smmu compatible(qcom,sc7280-smmu-500) first and runs that
specific impl and we never reach adreno smmu specific implementation.

Suggested-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Acked-by: Jordan Crouse <jordan@...micpenguin.net>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
index bea3ee0dabc2..03f048aebb80 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
@@ -345,11 +345,17 @@ struct arm_smmu_device *qcom_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
 {
 	const struct device_node *np = smmu->dev->of_node;
 
-	if (of_match_node(qcom_smmu_impl_of_match, np))
-		return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_smmu_impl);
-
+	/*
+	 * Do not change this order of implementation, i.e., first adreno
+	 * smmu impl and then apss smmu since we can have both implementing
+	 * arm,mmu-500 in which case we will miss setting adreno smmu specific
+	 * features if the order is changed.
+	 */
 	if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,adreno-smmu"))
 		return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_adreno_smmu_impl);
 
+	if (of_match_node(qcom_smmu_impl_of_match, np))
+		return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_smmu_impl);
+
 	return smmu;
 }
-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation