[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YH5+/P0iQ6irl7us@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:13:00 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 042/103] net/rds: Avoid potential use after free in
rds_send_remove_from_sock
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 03:05:53PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>
>
> [ Upstream commit 0c85a7e87465f2d4cbc768e245f4f45b2f299b05 ]
>
> In case of rs failure in rds_send_remove_from_sock(), the 'rm' resource
> is freed and later under spinlock, causing potential use-after-free.
> Set the free pointer to NULL to avoid undefined behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>
> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> ---
> net/rds/message.c | 1 +
> net/rds/send.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/rds/message.c b/net/rds/message.c
> index 799034e0f513..4fc66ff0f1ec 100644
> --- a/net/rds/message.c
> +++ b/net/rds/message.c
> @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ void rds_message_put(struct rds_message *rm)
> rds_message_purge(rm);
>
> kfree(rm);
> + rm = NULL;
> }
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rds_message_put);
> diff --git a/net/rds/send.c b/net/rds/send.c
> index 985d0b7713ac..fe5264b9d4b3 100644
> --- a/net/rds/send.c
> +++ b/net/rds/send.c
> @@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ static void rds_send_remove_from_sock(struct list_head *messages, int status)
> unlock_and_drop:
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rm->m_rs_lock, flags);
> rds_message_put(rm);
> - if (was_on_sock)
> + if (was_on_sock && rm)
> rds_message_put(rm);
> }
>
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>
>
Ah crap, I will go drop this stuff.
I also will strongly recommend that all maintainers blacklist umn.edu
patches at this point in time, as it is obvious that a professor there
is operating a sociological experiment on Linux kernel maintainers and
is wasting our time.
This is not ok.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists