[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQJ2ijjamaBxrF9di-D5Owh919qzNuPv+CW+sQ1xUxRF4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 18:11:58 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Fix some invalid links in bpf_devel_QA.rst
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 4:20 AM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>
> There exist some errors "404 Not Found" when I click the link
> of "MAINTAINERS" [1], "samples/bpf/" [2] and "selftests" [3]
> in the documentation "HOWTO interact with BPF subsystem" [4].
>
> Use correct link of "MAINTAINERS" and just remove the links of
> "samples/bpf/" and "selftests" because there are no related
> documentations.
...
> .. Links
> .. _Documentation/process/: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/
> -.. _MAINTAINERS: ../../MAINTAINERS
> .. _netdev-FAQ: ../networking/netdev-FAQ.rst
> -.. _samples/bpf/: ../../samples/bpf/
> -.. _selftests: ../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
I'm fine with removing maintainers and samples links, but selftests
would be good to keep.
There is no documentation inside selftests, but clicking to go to
source code feels useful.
Instead of removing could you make it clickable?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists