linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 5/7] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add MSI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:44:02 +0200
From:   Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, youlin.pei@...iatek.com,
        chuanjia.liu@...iatek.com, qizhong.cheng@...iatek.com,
        sin_jieyang@...iatek.com, drinkcat@...omium.org,
        Rex-BC.Chen@...iatek.com, anson.chuang@...iatek.com,
        Krzysztof Wilczyski <kw@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/7] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add MSI support

Hello!

On Tuesday 20 April 2021 14:17:21 Jianjun Wang wrote:
> +static void mtk_pcie_enable_msi(struct mtk_pcie_port *port)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < PCIE_MSI_SET_NUM; i++) {
> +		struct mtk_msi_set *msi_set = &port->msi_sets[i];
> +
> +		msi_set->base = port->base + PCIE_MSI_SET_BASE_REG +
> +				i * PCIE_MSI_SET_OFFSET;
> +		msi_set->msg_addr = port->reg_base + PCIE_MSI_SET_BASE_REG +
> +				    i * PCIE_MSI_SET_OFFSET;
> +
> +		/* Configure the MSI capture address */
> +		writel_relaxed(lower_32_bits(msi_set->msg_addr), msi_set->base);
> +		writel_relaxed(upper_32_bits(msi_set->msg_addr),
> +			       port->base + PCIE_MSI_SET_ADDR_HI_BASE +
> +			       i * PCIE_MSI_SET_ADDR_HI_OFFSET);

This looks like as setting MSI doorbell address to MSI doorbell address.

> +static void mtk_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_msi_set *msi_set = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +	struct mtk_pcie_port *port = data->domain->host_data;
> +	unsigned long hwirq;
> +
> +	hwirq =	data->hwirq % PCIE_MSI_IRQS_PER_SET;
> +
> +	msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(msi_set->msg_addr);
> +	msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(msi_set->msg_addr);
> +	msg->data = hwirq;
> +	dev_dbg(port->dev, "msi#%#lx address_hi %#x address_lo %#x data %d\n",
> +		hwirq, msg->address_hi, msg->address_lo, msg->data);

... which is later used in compose_msi_msg().

Marc in some other patches for other pci controller drivers changed this
address to just main "port" structure. It simplified implementations and
also avoided need to declare additional member "msg_addr".

Marc, would it be possible to simplify it also for this driver and just
set msg_addr to virt_to_phys(port)?