[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YH4aIECa/J/1uS5S@T590>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 08:02:40 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc: jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kashyap.desai@...adcom.com, dgilbert@...erlog.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: core: Cap initial sdev queue depth at
shost.can_queue
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:06:24AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
> Function sdev_store_queue_depth() enforces that the sdev queue depth cannot
> exceed shost.can_queue.
>
> However, the LLDD may still set cmd_per_lun > can_queue, which leads to an
> initial sdev queue depth greater than can_queue.
>
> Stop this happened by capping initial sdev queue depth at can_queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
> ---
> Topic originally discussed at:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/85dec8eb-8eab-c7d6-b0fb-5622747c5499@interlog.com/T/#m5663d0cac657d843b93d0c9a2374f98fc04384b9
>
> Last idea there was to error/warn in scsi_add_host() for cmd_per_lun >
No, that isn't my suggestion.
> can_queue. However, such a shost driver could still configure the sdev
> queue depth to be sound value at .slave_configure callback, so now thinking
> the orig patch better.
As I mentioned last time, why can't we fix ->cmd_per_lun in
scsi_add_host() using .can_queue?
--
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists