linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] mm,hwpoison: add kill_accessing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Apr 2021 18:49:15 -0700
From:   Jue Wang <juew@...gle.com>
To:     nao.horiguchi@...il.com, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bp@...en8.de, david@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, luto@...nel.org,
        naoya.horiguchi@....com, osalvador@...e.de, yaoaili@...gsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] mm,hwpoison: add kill_accessing_process() to find
 error virtual address

On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 07:43:20 +0900, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
...
> + * This function is intended to handle "Action Required" MCEs on already
> + * hardware poisoned pages. They could happen, for example, when
> + * memory_failure() failed to unmap the error page at the first call, or
> + * when multiple Action Optional MCE events races on different CPUs with
> + * Local MCE enabled.

+Tony Luck

Hey Tony, I thought SRAO MCEs are broadcasted to all cores in the system
as they come without an execution context, is it correct?

If Yes, Naoya, I think we might want to remove the comments about the
"multiple Action Optional MCE racing" part.

Best,
-Jue