[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5CcoKDZhj5rQ0_0wkHgk5Mf2RtAHy94EAzjwVgXvvmNeg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:27:05 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: dillon.minfei@...il.com
Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
Stefan Riedmueller <s.riedmueller@...tec.de>,
Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>,
leoyang.li@....com, arnd@...db.de, olof@...om.net,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
prabhakar.csengg@...il.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-imx@....com,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] arm: dts: imx: Add i.mx6q DaSheng COM-9XX SBC
board support
Hi Dillon,
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 1:05 AM <dillon.minfei@...il.com> wrote:
> + green {
> + gpios = <&gpio4 8 0>;
Please use GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH label instead:
gpios = <&gpio4 8 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +&clks {
> + assigned-clocks = <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_LDB_DI0_SEL>,
> + <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_LDB_DI1_SEL>;
> + assigned-clock-parents = <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL3_USB_OTG>,
> + <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL3_USB_OTG>;
> +};
You are setting the LDB clock parent, but you don't use LDB in this
devicetree. You could simply remove this.
> +&ecspi1 {
> + cs-gpios = <&gpio4 9 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ecspi1>;
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + flash: m25p80@0 {
Node names should be generic:
m25p80: flash@0
> +&iomuxc {
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_hog>;
> +
> + imx6qdl-ds {
> + pinctrl_hog: hoggrp {
> + fsl,pins = <
> + MX6QDL_PAD_NANDF_D0__GPIO2_IO00 0x1b0b0
> + MX6QDL_PAD_NANDF_D1__GPIO2_IO01 0x1b0b0
> + MX6QDL_PAD_GPIO_0__CCM_CLKO1 0x130b0
This could be part of the pinctrl_ov2659 group as it provides the
clock for the camera.
Please try to keep in the hoggrp only the pins that cannot be
controlled by any other node.
> +&wdog1 {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&wdog2 {
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_wdog>;
> + fsl,ext-reset-output;
> + status = "disabled";
Wouldn't it be better to enable wdog2 and disable wdog1 instead? wdog2
provides a POR, which is preferred.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists