[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YH7tL77Z9UzTAFca@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 18:03:11 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] memblock: update initialization of reserved pages
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 03:56:28PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 20.04.21 11:09, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
> >
> > The struct pages representing a reserved memory region are initialized
> > using reserve_bootmem_range() function. This function is called for each
> > reserved region just before the memory is freed from memblock to the buddy
> > page allocator.
> >
> > The struct pages for MEMBLOCK_NOMAP regions are kept with the default
> > values set by the memory map initialization which makes it necessary to
> > have a special treatment for such pages in pfn_valid() and
> > pfn_valid_within().
>
> Just a general question while thinking about it:
>
> Would we right now initialize the memmap of these pages already via
> memmap_init_zone()->memmap_init_range()? (IOW, not marking the
> PageReserved?)
Yep. These pages are part of memblock.memory so they are initialized in
memmap_init_zone()->memmap_init_range() to the default values.
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists