linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RFC] tracing: Enable tracepoints via module parameters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210420113456.46755ce7@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:34:56 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        fweisbec <fweisbec@...il.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, chris <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
        yuanhan liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] tracing: Enable tracepoints via module parameters

On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:15:10 -0400 (EDT)
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:

> That sounds fine. So that would be within the "trace_event" (and not tracepoint)
> namespace for module load parameters as well ?

Right, it would be "trace_event=...." not "tracepoint=..."

-- Steve