lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 20 Apr 2021 08:42:53 -0700
From:   "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:     Jue Wang <juew@...gle.com>
Cc:     nao.horiguchi@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bp@...en8.de,
        david@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        luto@...nel.org, naoya.horiguchi@....com, osalvador@...e.de,
        yaoaili@...gsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] mm,hwpoison: add kill_accessing_process() to find
 error virtual address

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 06:49:15PM -0700, Jue Wang wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 07:43:20 +0900, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> ...
> > + * This function is intended to handle "Action Required" MCEs on already
> > + * hardware poisoned pages. They could happen, for example, when
> > + * memory_failure() failed to unmap the error page at the first call, or
> > + * when multiple Action Optional MCE events races on different CPUs with
> > + * Local MCE enabled.
> 
> +Tony Luck
> 
> Hey Tony, I thought SRAO MCEs are broadcasted to all cores in the system
> as they come without an execution context, is it correct?
> 
> If Yes, Naoya, I think we might want to remove the comments about the
> "multiple Action Optional MCE racing" part.

Jue,

Correct. SRAO machine checks are broadcast.  But rather than remove the
second part, just replace with "multiple local machine checks on different
CPUs".

-Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ