linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf/core: Share an event with multiple cgroups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM9d7chaxr4o3iY1Y+Z9W0C5rZ7gazvUA2U+Uq_L6CHaHsFqGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:37:11 +0900
From:   Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf/core: Share an event with multiple cgroups

Hi Peter,

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:28 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 06:49:09PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:51 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > > +static void perf_update_cgroup_node(struct perf_event *event, struct cgroup *cgrp)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     u64 delta_count, delta_time_enabled, delta_time_running;
> > > > +     int i;
> > > > +
> > > > +     if (event->cgrp_node_count == 0)
> > > > +             goto out;
> > > > +
> > > > +     delta_count = local64_read(&event->count) - event->cgrp_node_count;
>
> From here...
>
> > > > +     delta_time_enabled = event->total_time_enabled - event->cgrp_node_time_enabled;
> > > > +     delta_time_running = event->total_time_running - event->cgrp_node_time_running;
> > > > +
> > > > +     /* account delta to all ancestor cgroups */
> > > > +     for (i = 0; i <= cgrp->level; i++) {
> > > > +             struct perf_cgroup_node *node;
> > > > +
> > > > +             node = find_cgroup_node(event, cgrp->ancestor_ids[i]);
> > > > +             if (node) {
> > > > +                     node->count += delta_count;
> > > > +                     node->time_enabled += delta_time_enabled;
> > > > +                     node->time_running += delta_time_running;
> > > > +             }
> > > > +     }
>
> ... till here, NMI could hit and increment event->count, which then
> means that:
>
> > > > +
> > > > +out:
> > > > +     event->cgrp_node_count = local64_read(&event->count);
>
> This load doesn't match the delta_count load and events will go missing.
>
> Obviously correct solution is:
>
>         event->cgrp_node_count += delta_count;
>
>
> > > > +     event->cgrp_node_time_enabled = event->total_time_enabled;
> > > > +     event->cgrp_node_time_running = event->total_time_running;
>
> And while total_time doesn't have that problem, consistency would then
> have you do:
>
>         event->cgrp_node_time_foo += delta_time_foo;
>
> > >
> > > This is wrong; there's no guarantee these are the same values you read
> > > at the begin, IOW you could be loosing events.
> >
> > Could you please elaborate?
>
> You forgot NMI.

Thanks for your explanation.  Maybe I'm missing something but
this event is basically for counting and doesn't allow sampling.
Do you say it's affected by other sampling events?  Note that
it's not reading from the PMU here, what it reads is a snapshot
of last pmu->read(event) afaik.

Thanks,
Namhyung