linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 22/25] perf tests: Support 'Parse and process metrics' test for hybrid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YIBvD16uYZspDVDa@krava>
Date:   Wed, 21 Apr 2021 20:29:35 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 22/25] perf tests: Support 'Parse and process metrics'
 test for hybrid

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 10:05:14PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> Some events are not supported. Only pick up some cases for hybrid.
> 
>   # ./perf test 67
>   67: Parse and process metrics                                       : Ok
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c b/tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c
> index 4968c4106254..24e5ddff515e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  #include "debug.h"
>  #include "expr.h"
>  #include "stat.h"
> +#include "pmu.h"
>  
>  static struct pmu_event pme_test[] = {
>  {
> @@ -370,12 +371,17 @@ static int test_metric_group(void)
>  
>  int test__parse_metric(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_unused)
>  {
> +	perf_pmu__scan(NULL);

perf_pmu__has_hybrid calls perf_pmu__scan no?

jirka

> +
>  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("IPC failed", test_ipc() == 0);
>  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("frontend failed", test_frontend() == 0);
> -	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("cache_miss_cycles failed", test_cache_miss_cycles() == 0);
>  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("DCache_L2 failed", test_dcache_l2() == 0);
>  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("recursion fail failed", test_recursion_fail() == 0);
> -	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("test metric group", test_metric_group() == 0);
>  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Memory bandwidth", test_memory_bandwidth() == 0);
> +
> +	if (!perf_pmu__has_hybrid()) {
> +		TEST_ASSERT_VAL("cache_miss_cycles failed", test_cache_miss_cycles() == 0);
> +		TEST_ASSERT_VAL("test metric group", test_metric_group() == 0);
> +	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>