linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/speculation: Add PSF mitigation kernel parameters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <569cf62f-ac3e-d9be-8a59-5bb354c6cafa@amd.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:05:00 -0500
From:   "Saripalli, RK" <rsaripal@....com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/speculation: Add PSF mitigation kernel parameters



On 4/21/2021 1:57 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 01:55:03PM -0500, Saripalli, RK wrote:
>> I separated them into separate patches because the KVM patch depends on one of the patch.
>> The corresponding QEMU patch depends on another patch.
>>
>> By separating them into 4 separate patches, my thinking was I could keep them logically separate.
> 
> Sure but they all go together through the same tree - why does that
> matter for Qemu/KVM?

Ok. I will combine all the 4 patches into one patch and resend that one patch.

Thanks,
RK
>