linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 073/190] Revert "media: rcar

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YICXdauWkNRezHgX@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:21:57 +0300
From:   Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Niklas Söderlund 
        <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 073/190] Revert "media: rcar_drif: fix a memory
 disclosure"

Hi Geert,

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:58:22PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 3:06 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This reverts commit d39083234c60519724c6ed59509a2129fd2aed41.
> >
> > Commits from @umn.edu addresses have been found to be submitted in "bad
> > faith" to try to test the kernel community's ability to review "known
> > malicious" changes.  The result of these submissions can be found in a
> > paper published at the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
> > entitled, "Open Source Insecurity: Stealthily Introducing
> > Vulnerabilities via Hypocrite Commits" written by Qiushi Wu (University
> > of Minnesota) and Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota).
> >
> > Because of this, all submissions from this group must be reverted from
> > the kernel tree and will need to be re-reviewed again to determine if
> > they actually are a valid fix.  Until that work is complete, remove this
> > change to ensure that no problems are being introduced into the
> > codebase.
> >
> > Cc: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
> > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> > Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
> > Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> 
> Upon a second look, I still see nothing wrong with the original commit.
> However, as I'm no v4l expert, I'd like to defer to the experts for final
> judgement.

It seems fine to me, but it also seems unneeded, as the V4L2 core clears
the whole f->fmt union before calling this operation. The revert will
this improve performance very slightly.

> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/rcar_drif.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rcar_drif.c
> > @@ -915,7 +915,6 @@ static int rcar_drif_g_fmt_sdr_cap(struct file *file, void *priv,
> >  {
> >         struct rcar_drif_sdr *sdr = video_drvdata(file);
> >
> > -       memset(f->fmt.sdr.reserved, 0, sizeof(f->fmt.sdr.reserved));
> >         f->fmt.sdr.pixelformat = sdr->fmt->pixelformat;
> >         f->fmt.sdr.buffersize = sdr->fmt->buffersize;
> >

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart