linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] docs: driver-model: Update the documentation for device class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YH/E90QVq7yP01ii@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Apr 2021 08:23:51 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs: driver-model: Update the documentation for
 device class

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:43:40AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 04:29:24PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org> writes:
> > 
> > > The current documentation about the device class is out of date such
> > > that it refers to non-existent APIs and structures. This commit updates
> > > them to the current device class APIs and structures, removes wordings
> > > that no longer valid while trying to keep the original content intact.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes in v2:
> > >
> > > * Fixed CLASS_ATTR_RW as spotted by Greg
> > >
> > >  .../driver-api/driver-model/class.rst         | 144 ++++++++----------
> > >  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Note that this file was removed in commit 1364c6787525 back in
> > February by Geert (added to CC).  If you want to update this document,
> > you'll first want to bring it back.
> > 
> 
> Oh thanks for the info! Perhaps I could just revert 1364c6787525 and add this
> commit on top?

Nah, leave it removed for now, it needs lots of work to be relevant.

greg k-h