[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210421072216.GB1418@agape.jhs>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:22:17 +0200
From: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>
To: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@...il.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] staging: media: atomisp: use printk with KERN
facility level
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:43:53PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:35:23AM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> > Hi Deepak,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:46:40AM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > > printk() without KERN_<LEVEL> facility is flagged by checkpatch as a
> > > warning. It is better to use pr_info() which comes with an
> > > inbuilt KERN_INFO level.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c
> > > index b572551f1a0d..a0f3c5c32f94 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c
> > > @@ -1020,7 +1020,7 @@ static int gc0310_set_fmt(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - printk("%s: before gc0310_write_reg_array %s\n", __func__,
> > > + pr_info("%s: before gc0310_write_reg_array %s\n", __func__,
> > > gc0310_res[dev->fmt_idx].desc);
> >
> > in a driver is best recommended to replace a raw printk call
> > with a dev_*() log. Check few lines above here to see
> > how it is done.
>
> Hello Fabio,
> thank you for the feedback. Should I resubmit this patch with additional
> printk() / pr_info() replacement by dev_*()? OR send in a new patch with
> this change? Just want to make sure I am not including more than one
> change type in the patch.
>
> deepak.
>
Hi Deepak,
what I would do is to just resend this patch with replacement by dev_*(),
which is just one change. Then if you want to replace all other
raw printk/pr_*() occurrences is matter of another separate
patch/series.
> >
> >
> > > ret = startup(sd);
> > > if (ret) {
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > thank you,
> >
> > fabio
thank you,
fabio
Powered by blists - more mailing lists