lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 21 Apr 2021 10:51:13 +0300
From:   Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for devm helpers


On Tue, 2021-03-23 at 15:19 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 02:58:28PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 3/23/21 2:56 PM, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > > Devm helper header containing small inline helpers was added.
> > > Hans promised to maintain it.
> > > 
> > > Add Hans as maintainer and myself as designated reviewer.
> > > 
> > Ultimately this is up to Greg though, so lets wait and see what
> > Greg has to say about this.
> 
> Can we move some of the devm_* calls in include/device.h into here as
> well so that you all can be in charge of them instead of me?

Seems like this was left w/o answer. I guess the question was pointed
to Hans - but what comes to my (not always so humble) opinion - most of
the devm functions in device.h are tightly related to the device
interface or devres. Thus the device.h feels like appropriate place for
most of those. OTOH, the kmalloc/kfree related functions, strdub and
kmemdub might be candidates for move - those are not really "device
things".

But this is really not my call :)

Best Regards
	Matti Vaittinen

-- 
Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers
ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC
Kiviharjunlenkki 1E
90220 OULU
FINLAND


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ