linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH net-next 4/6] r8152: support new chips

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cc2e5a6ba1b649d3a5806f71256e657f@realtek.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:23:47 +0000
From:   Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 4/6] r8152: support new chips

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 2:34 AM
[...]
> > We test 2.5G Ethernet on some embedded platform.
> > And we find 64 is not large enough, and the performance
> > couldn't reach 2.5 G bits/s.
> 
> Did you manage to identify what the cause is?
> 
> NAPI will keep calling your driver if the budget was exhausted, the
> only difference between 64 and 256 should be the setup cost of the
> driver's internal loop. And perhaps more frequent GRO flush - what's
> the CONFIG_HZ set to?

I am not sure. It is more than one year ago.
The CONFIG_HZ may be 250.

First, the CPU of that platform is slower than a x86 platform.
Then, the rx data comes very fast, because of the 2.5G Ethernet.
We find the budget is always exhausted, when the traffic is busy.

Best Regards,
Hayes