[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f131569c39ac4bbef0ac6b83e009470a43088c60.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:39:19 +0300
From: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for devm helpers
On Wed, 2021-04-21 at 14:09 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 01:58:29PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 4/21/21 9:51 AM, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2021-03-23 at 15:19 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 02:58:28PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > On 3/23/21 2:56 PM, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > > > > > Devm helper header containing small inline helpers was
> > > > > > added.
> > > > > > Hans promised to maintain it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Add Hans as maintainer and myself as designated reviewer.
> > > > > >
> > > > > Ultimately this is up to Greg though, so lets wait and see
> > > > > what
> > > > > Greg has to say about this.
> > > >
> > > > Can we move some of the devm_* calls in include/device.h into
> > > > here as
> > > > well so that you all can be in charge of them instead of me?
> > >
> > > Seems like this was left w/o answer. I guess the question was
> > > pointed
> > > to Hans
> >
> > I believe that Greg was (mostly) joking here. At least that is how
> > I interpreted Greg's reply,which is why I did not answer.
>
> I have no idea what this thread was about anymore, sorry :)
Need more B12 ;) Can't remember a minor discussion just a few thousand
other patch mails ago? Huh, that's what the age does, right :p
Well,
this is not urgent in any way but here's some context:
> This series implements delayed wq cancellation on top of devm and
> replaces
> the obvious cases where only thing remove call-back in a driver does
> is
> cancelling the work. There might be other cases where we could switch
> more than just work cancellation to use managed version and thus get
> rid
> of remove or mixed (manual and devm) resource management.
>
> The series introduces include/linux/devm-helpers.h file which
> hopefully works as a place where this kind of helpers can be inlined.
and your reply:
> Can we move some of the devm_* calls in include/device.h into here
> as well ...
I thought you meant that literally, Hans assumed you were joking - and
you don't remember how it was :] So - if no further suggestions, then
we keep the devm stuff which is currently in device.h still in
device.h. Although the malloc/free stuff is not really strictly device
thing.
Best Regards
Matti Vaittinen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists