[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210421031019.GF3596236@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 04:10:19 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Yejune Deng <yejune.deng@...il.com>
Cc: cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slab.c: use 'ac' from the caller
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:25:17AM +0800, Yejune Deng wrote:
> @@ -3045,12 +3044,7 @@ static inline void *____cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t flags)
> }
>
> STATS_INC_ALLOCMISS(cachep);
> - objp = cache_alloc_refill(cachep, flags);
> - /*
> - * the 'ac' may be updated by cache_alloc_refill(),
> - * and kmemleak_erase() requires its correct value.
> - */
> - ac = cpu_cache_get(cachep);
> + objp = cache_alloc_refill(cachep, ac, flags);
I think passing 'ac' in is fine (probably? I don't know this code
deeply), but deleting this call to 'ac' is clearly wrong. The comment
even tells you that! I just verified the code, and the comment is
correct.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists