[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YIAqC5su75GGu+Qx@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:35:07 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
"Hyser,Chris" <chris.hyser@...cle.com>,
Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Glexiner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] sched: Core scheduling interfaces
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:00:57AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 09:35:07PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > Peter, any thoughts on this?
>
> Adding CGROUP_SHARE is not sufficient to close the hole against CLEAR.
> So we either then have to 'tweak' the meaning of CLEAR or replace it
> entirely, neither seem attractive.
>
>
> I'd love to make some progress on all this.
Can I comment out CLEAR so we can sort that out later? I suppose people
can still do temp cookies simply by using a temp task.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists