linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: re-write copy in pmc_core_lpm_latch_mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210421153258.GK1959@kadam>
Date:   Wed, 21 Apr 2021 18:32:58 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     Rajneesh Bhardwaj <irenic.rajneesh@...il.com>,
        David E Box <david.e.box@...el.com>,
        Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
        "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: re-write copy in
 pmc_core_lpm_latch_mode_write()

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 04:11:15PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> This should fix that however, while sticking with simple_write_to_buffer():

I really want to get rid of the simple_write_to_buffer().  Using it
would make sense if we wanted the user to be able to seek to the middle
of buf[] but that would just be an info leak.

regards,
dan carpenter