lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 21 Apr 2021 18:32:58 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     Rajneesh Bhardwaj <irenic.rajneesh@...il.com>,
        David E Box <david.e.box@...el.com>,
        Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
        "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: re-write copy in
 pmc_core_lpm_latch_mode_write()

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 04:11:15PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> This should fix that however, while sticking with simple_write_to_buffer():

I really want to get rid of the simple_write_to_buffer().  Using it
would make sense if we wanted the user to be able to seek to the middle
of buf[] but that would just be an info leak.

regards,
dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ