linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] bitmap_parse: support 'all' semantics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210421155748.GU975577@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Date:   Wed, 21 Apr 2021 08:57:48 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
        Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bitmap_parse: support 'all' semantics

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:19:32AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:13:25 -0700
> Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > @@ -76,6 +76,11 @@ to change, such as less cores in the CPU list, then N and any ranges using N
> >  will also change.  Use the same on a small 4 core system, and "16-N" becomes
> >  "16-3" and now the same boot input will be flagged as invalid (start > end).
> >  
> > +The special case-tolerant group name "all" has a meaning of selecting all CPUs,
> > +such that "isolcpus=all" is the equivalent of "isolcpus=0-N".
> 
> I'm OK with the concept of this patch set, but really? That is a horrible
> example. One should NEVER set isolcpus to all!

How about "isolcpus=all:2/4"?  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

> -- Steve
> 
> 
> > +
> > +The semantics of "N" and "all" is supported on a level of bitmaps and holds for
> > +all users of bitmap_parse().
> >