[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOd=KP5CZ5wOrczC6qPAzN7DdFCJ_XvU6e=zvB3XpQrp_-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:44:02 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/vdso64: link vdso64 with linker
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 11:02 AM Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy@...roup.eu> wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 02/09/2020 à 19:41, Nick Desaulniers a écrit :
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 5:14 AM Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> >>
> >> Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> writes:
> >>> Fixes: commit f2af201002a8 ("powerpc/build: vdso linker warning for orphan sections")
> >>
> >> I think I'll just revert that for v5.9 ?
> >
> > SGTM; you'll probably still want these changes with some modifications
> > at some point; vdso32 did have at least one orphaned section, and will
> > be important for hermetic builds. Seeing crashes in supported
> > versions of the tools ties our hands at the moment.
> >
>
> Keeping the tool problem aside with binutils 2.26, do you have a way to
> really link an elf32ppc object when building vdso32 for PPC64 ?
Sorry, I'm doing a bug scrub and found
https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/774 still open (and my
reply to this thread still in Drafts; never sent). With my patches
rebased:
$ file arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/vdso32.so
arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/vdso32.so: ELF 32-bit MSB shared object,
PowerPC or cisco 4500, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, stripped
Are you still using 2.26?
I'm not able to repro Nathan's reported issue from
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200902052123.GA2687902@ubuntu-n2-xlarge-x86/,
so I'm curious if I should resend the rebased patches as v2?
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists