linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Add a check for gss_release

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YID0Fg3f0PzckJI9@unreal>
Date:   Thu, 22 Apr 2021 06:57:10 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
        "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>,
        Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@...hat.com>,
        Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Add a check for gss_release_msg

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:34:59PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:48:46AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 05:15:26PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > This thread is the first I'm hearing about this. I wonder if there is
> > > > a good way of alerting the entire kernel community (including those
> > > > only subscribed to subsystem mailing lists) about what's going on? It
> > > > seems like useful information to have to push back against these
> > > > patches.
> 
> Heh, I've got this information from google news feed on my phone :)
>  
> > > IMHO, kernel users ML is good enough for that.
> > 
> > The problem is that LKML is too high traffic for a lot of people to
> > want to follow.
> 
> I think Leon meant kernel.org users ML (users@...ux.kernel.org). Along with
> ksummut-discuss it'll reach most maintainers, IMHO.

Exactly.

Thanks

>  
> > There are some people who have used the kernel summit discuss list
> > (previously ksummit-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org, now
> > ksummit@...ts.linux.dev) as a place where most maintainers tend to be
> > subscribed, although that's not really a guarantee, either.  (Speaking
> > of which, how to handle groups who submit patches in bad faith a good
> > Maintainer Summit topic for someone to propose...)
> 
> -- 
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.