[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210422063128.GB4176641@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:31:28 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: mst@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xieyongji@...edance.com,
stefanha@...hat.com, file@...t.tu-berlin.de, ashish.kalra@....com,
martin.radev@...ec.fraunhofer.de, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Untrusted device support for virtio
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:21:10AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> The behaivor for non DMA API is kept for minimizing the performance
> impact.
NAK. Everyone should be using the DMA API in a modern world. So
treating the DMA API path worse than the broken legacy path does not
make any sense whatsoever.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists