[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b970a557-b869-c867-3825-370a36feef68@foss.st.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:30:16 +0200
From: Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...s.st.com>,
Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@...wei.com>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: stm32-qspi: fix debug format string
Hi Mark, Arnd
Regarding this issue, how do you prefer to proceed ?
Patrice
On 4/21/21 5:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 5:05 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 04:06:48PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>>>
>>> Printing size_t needs a special %zd format modifier to avoid a
>>> warning like:
>>
>> This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.
>
> It appears that you just applied 1b8a7d4282c0 ("spi: stm32-qspi:
> Fix compilation warning in ARM64") after today's linux-next was
> cut.
>
> I suspect Patrice's patch now causes a warning on all architectures
> on which size_t is defined as 'unsigned int'.
>
> Arnd
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists