lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:47:04 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cgroup tree with the kvm tree

On 22/04/21 09:33, Vipin Sharma wrote:
> First of all, I am sorry that my patch series has caused this trouble to
> all of you. I am not aware of the correct way to submit a patch series
> which changes files in more than one maintainer's territory. Any
> guidance for the future will be helpful.

Vipin, don't worry as you don't have to do anything (and didn't do 
anything wrong, for that matter).  It's all in the maintainers' hands; 
Stephen takes care of warning maintainers of what will happen in the 
next merge window, but as far as you're concerned you're all set.

You can check the current state of the merge in the queue branch of the 
KVM tree.  This is what I plan to merge if Tejun agrees.  That would be 
helpful indeed!

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ