[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e590c4f6-ad6a-26a4-4f5f-9e6e63bfb15a@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:16:43 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Matt Morehouse <mascasa@...gle.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] signal: Introduce TRAP_PERF si_code and si_perf
to siginfo
On 22/04/2021 07:47, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 08:12, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com> wrote:
> [...]
>>> So I think we just have to settle on 'unsigned long' here. On many
>>> architectures, like 32-bit Arm, the alignment of a structure is that of
>>> its largest member. This means that there is no portable way to add
>>> 64-bit integers to siginfo_t on 32-bit architectures.
>>>
>>> In the case of the si_perf field, word size is sufficient since the data
>>> it contains is user-defined. On 32-bit architectures, any excess bits of
>>> perf_event_attr::sig_data will therefore be truncated when copying into
>>> si_perf.
>>>
>>> Feel free to test the below if you have time, but the below lets me boot
>>> 32-bit arm which previously timed out. It also passes all the
>>> static_asserts() I added (will send those as separate patches).
>>>
>>> Once I'm convinced this passes all others tests too, I'll send a patch.
>>
>> This fixes the issue I've observed on my test systems. Feel free to add:
>>
>> Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
>>
>> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
>
> Thank you for testing! It's been sent:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422064437.3577327-1-elver@google.com
Thanks! This fixes the problem for Tegra as well. I have responded to
the above patch with my tested-by.
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists