Message-ID: <20210422110336.1d67678d@coco.lan>
Date:   Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:03:36 +0200
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
        Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Niklas Söderlund 
        <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 073/190] Revert "media: rcar_drif: fix a memory
 disclosure"

Em Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:29:36 +0200
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl> escreveu:

> On 22/04/2021 08:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Laurent,
> > 
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:22 PM Laurent Pinchart
> > <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> wrote:  
> >> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:58:22PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:  
> >>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 3:06 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:  
> >>>> This reverts commit d39083234c60519724c6ed59509a2129fd2aed41.
> >>>>
> >>>> Commits from @umn.edu addresses have been found to be submitted in "bad
> >>>> faith" to try to test the kernel community's ability to review "known
> >>>> malicious" changes.  The result of these submissions can be found in a
> >>>> paper published at the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
> >>>> entitled, "Open Source Insecurity: Stealthily Introducing
> >>>> Vulnerabilities via Hypocrite Commits" written by Qiushi Wu (University
> >>>> of Minnesota) and Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota).
> >>>>
> >>>> Because of this, all submissions from this group must be reverted from
> >>>> the kernel tree and will need to be re-reviewed again to determine if
> >>>> they actually are a valid fix.  Until that work is complete, remove this
> >>>> change to ensure that no problems are being introduced into the
> >>>> codebase.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cc: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
> >>>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> >>>> Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
> >>>> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>  
> >>>
> >>> Upon a second look, I still see nothing wrong with the original commit.
> >>> However, as I'm no v4l expert, I'd like to defer to the experts for final
> >>> judgement.  
> >>
> >> It seems fine to me, but it also seems unneeded, as the V4L2 core clears
> >> the whole f->fmt union before calling this operation. The revert will
> >> this improve performance very slightly.  
> > 
> > Hmm, that means very recent commit f12b81e47f48940a ("media: core
> > headers: fix kernel-doc warnings") is not fully correct, as it added
> > kerneldoc stating this is the responsibility of the driver:
> > 
> > + * @reserved:          drivers and applications must zero this array  
> 
> Actually, it is the V4L2 core used by the driver that zeroes this. So
> drivers don't need to do this, it's done for them. It used to be the
> responsibility of the driver itself, but this was all moved to the core
> framework a long time ago since, duh!, drivers always forgot this :-)
> 
> > 
> > Anyway, it doesn't look like this umn.edu patch introduced a bug.  
> 
> I haven't seen any bugs introduced by the media patches from umn.edu.

Hi Greg,

I also double-checked all media revert patches from:

	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git umn.edu-reverts

currently on this patch:
	6f4747a872ad Revert "ethtool: fix a potential missing-check bug"

That's a summary of what I found:

All of those should be dropped from your tree:

	84fdb5856edd	Revert "media: si2165: fix a missing check of return value"
	867043f2206e	Revert "media: video-mux: fix null pointer dereferences"
	78ae4b621297	Revert "media: cx231xx: replace BUG_ON with recovery code"
	5be328a55817	Revert "media: saa7146: Avoid using BUG_ON as an assertion"
	81ce83158d22	Revert "media: davinci/vpfe_capture.c: Avoid BUG_ON for register failure"
	3319b39504b8	Revert "media: media/saa7146: fix incorrect assertion in saa7146_buffer_finish"
	b393f7cb29a2	Revert "media: rcar-vin: Fix a reference count leak."
	197bc5d03682	Revert "media: rcar-vin: Fix a reference count leak."
	2fd9cf68bbb6	Revert "media: rockchip/rga: Fix a reference count leak."
	d1e4614eca24	Revert "media: platform: fcp: Fix a reference count leak."
	416e8a6ae07f	Revert "media: camss: Fix a reference count leak."
	06b793ae497b	Revert "media: s5p-mfc: Fix a reference count leak"
	8f9fc14a7cc9	Revert "media: stm32-dcmi: Fix a reference count leak"
	556e1f86ba24	Revert "media: ti-vpe: Fix a missing check and reference count leak"
	5f5b1722ad0d	Revert "media: exynos4-is: Fix a reference count leak"
	f4c758c6c1cb	Revert "media: exynos4-is: Fix a reference count leak due to pm_runtime_get_sync"
	beb717878c73	Revert "media: exynos4-is: Fix several reference count leaks due to pm_runtime_get_sync
	7066ec748bfd	Revert "media: sti: Fix reference count leaks"
	cdd117093b19	Revert "media: st-delta: Fix reference count leak in delta_run_work"

As, after my re-check, they all seem to be addressing real issues. So,
NACK on those.

This patch (073/190):

	899ab4671bc0	Revert "media: rcar_drif: fix a memory disclosure"

While it doesn't hurt, it is useless, as the media core already
prevents memory disclosure. So, it should be reverted.

So, for patch 073/190:

Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>

Thanks,
Mauro

Powered by blists - more mailing lists