linux-kernel - Re: arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c:106 early_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:06:52 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To:     Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@....com>,
        Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
        Yang Li <yang.lee@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c:106 early_get_pnodeid() warn:
 inconsistent indenting

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 06:38:37PM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
> I'm a bit confused.  I have this in my inbox that someone else has this fix.
> So will that fix be applied or should I send a separate one that is
> essentially a duplicate?

I'm not even considering that fix because I'm tired of getting some
half-baked robot mails which only resemble patches. The obnoxiousness to
not have the decency to sit down and write a proper commit message is
getting totally out of control.

Apparently some people(?) think that sending robot output to real humans
*without* even vetting that output is a good idea so off to /dev/null it
goes.

If you want this fixed, you could do a proper patch with a sensible
commit message and I'll take it.

I'm tired of dumb robots.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg