[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2104221053500.44318@angie.orcam.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:12:40 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
To: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
cc: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] MIPS: Avoid DIVU in `__div64_32' is result would be
zero
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> > Thomas, as this mistake has spread across three out of these patches,
> > both in change descriptions and actual code, would you mind dropping the
> > series from mips-next altogether and I'll respin the series with all
> > these issues corrected?
>
> I'm sorry, but I don't rebase mips-next and the patches have been pushed
> out before I received this mail.
Hmm, what about changes known to actually break something then? Like
with R6 here? Those will undoubtedly cause someone a headache with
bisection sometime in the future. Are you sure your policy is the best
possible?
NB, I have benchmarked the update with my DECstation, however my Malta
has not come up after a reboot last evening and neither it has after a few
remote power cycles. I have planned a visit in my lab next week anyway,
so I'll see what has happened there; hopefully I'm able to bring the board
back to life as I find it valuable for my purposes. I had to replace the
PSU it came with already a couple years back and the new one is supposedly
high-quality, so I fear it's the board itself.
Meanwhile I'll be able to give DECstation figures only. I guess such
limited results will suffice if I post the fix as an update rather than
replacement.
Maciej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists