linux-kernel - [PATCH 6/8] tick/nohz: Only wakeup a single target cpu when kicking a task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210422120158.33629-7-frederic@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:01:56 +0200
From:   Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@...wei.com>,
        Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/8] tick/nohz: Only wakeup a single target cpu when kicking a task

When adding a tick dependency to a task, its necessary to
wakeup the CPU where the task resides to reevaluate tick
dependencies on that CPU.

However the current code wakes up all nohz_full CPUs, which
is unnecessary.

Switch to waking up a single CPU, by using ordering of writes
to task->cpu and task->tick_dep_mask.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@...wei.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index ffc13b9dfbe3..45d9a4ea3ee0 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -322,6 +322,31 @@ void tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(int cpu)
 	irq_work_queue_on(&per_cpu(nohz_full_kick_work, cpu), cpu);
 }
 
+static void tick_nohz_kick_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+	int cpu = task_cpu(tsk);
+
+	/*
+	 * If the task concurrently migrates to another cpu,
+	 * we guarantee it sees the new tick dependency upon
+	 * schedule.
+	 *
+	 *
+	 * set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
+	 *   STORE p->cpu = @cpu
+	 * __schedule() (switch to task 'p')
+	 *   LOCK rq->lock
+	 *   smp_mb__after_spin_lock()          STORE p->tick_dep_mask
+	 *   tick_nohz_task_switch()            smp_mb() (atomic_fetch_or())
+	 *      LOAD p->tick_dep_mask           LOAD p->cpu
+	 */
+
+	preempt_disable();
+	if (cpu_online(cpu))
+		tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(cpu);
+	preempt_enable();
+}
+
 /*
  * Kick all full dynticks CPUs in order to force these to re-evaluate
  * their dependency on the tick and restart it if necessary.
@@ -404,19 +429,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tick_nohz_dep_clear_cpu);
  */
 void tick_nohz_dep_set_task(struct task_struct *tsk, enum tick_dep_bits bit)
 {
-	if (!atomic_fetch_or(BIT(bit), &tsk->tick_dep_mask)) {
-		if (tsk == current) {
-			preempt_disable();
-			tick_nohz_full_kick();
-			preempt_enable();
-		} else {
-			/*
-			 * Some future tick_nohz_full_kick_task()
-			 * should optimize this.
-			 */
-			tick_nohz_full_kick_all();
-		}
-	}
+	if (!atomic_fetch_or(BIT(bit), &tsk->tick_dep_mask))
+		tick_nohz_kick_task(tsk);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tick_nohz_dep_set_task);
 
-- 
2.25.1