[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210422122419.GF2047089@ziepe.ca>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:24:19 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Marion et Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
tj@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, saeedm@...dia.com,
leon@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Have 'alloc_workqueue()' like macros
accept a format specifier
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 01:02:34PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 4/18/21 11:36 PM, Marion et Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > The list in To: is the one given by get_maintainer.pl. Usualy, I only
> > put the ML in Cc: I've run the script on the 2 patches of the serie
> > and merged the 2 lists. Everyone is in the To: of the cover letter
> > and of the 2 patches.
> >
> > If Théo is "Tejun Heo" ( (maintainer:WORKQUEUE) ), he is already in
> > the To: line.
> Linus wants to see a "Cc: ${maintainer}" tag in patches that he receives
> from a maintainer and that modify another subsystem than the subsystem
> maintained by that maintainer.
Really? Do you remember a lore link for this?
Generally I've been junking the CC lines (vs Andrew at the other
extreme that often has 10's of CC lines)
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists