[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d96206db-96e2-1eb7-6b19-47c9596ccfea@nbd.name>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:33:31 +0200
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
To: Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@...il.com>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/14] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: reduce MDIO
bus access latency
On 2021-04-22 06:09, Ilya Lipnitskiy wrote:
> From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
>
> usleep_range often ends up sleeping much longer than the 10-20us provided
> as a range here. This causes significant latency in mdio bus acceses,
> which easily adds multiple seconds to the boot time on MT7621 when polling
> DSA slave ports.
>
> Use udelay via readx_poll_timeout_atomic, since the MDIO access does not
> take much time
>
> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
> [Ilya: use readx_poll_timeout_atomic instead of cond_resched]
I still prefer the cond_resched() variant. On a fully loaded system, I'd
prefer to let the MDIO access take longer instead of wasting cycles on
udelay.
- Felix
Powered by blists - more mailing lists