linux-kernel - Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: spi: Convert Freescale QSPI binding to json schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210422154555.GJ4572@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:45:55 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Kuldeep Singh <kuldeep.singh@....com>
Cc:     Han Xu <han.xu@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: spi: Convert Freescale QSPI
 binding to json schema

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:09:19AM +0000, Kuldeep Singh wrote:

> Apologies for content free pings.
> This patch has already been reviewed by Rob and can be accepted if no further changes required.

Whenever I complain about content free pings I also point out that
resends are helpful, it's not just don't ping it's also that having a
copy of the patch helps if anything went wrong:

Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.

Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
for the subsystem are normally handled.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)