| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20210422162958.GA1256950@xps15>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:29:58 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] rpmsg: char: Export eptdev create an destroy
functions
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 09:55:47AM +0200, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote:
> hello Mathieu
>
> On 4/21/21 7:52 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:44:52PM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> >> To prepare the split of the code related to the control (ctrldev)
> >> and the endpoint (eptdev) devices in 2 separate files:
> >>
> >> - Rename and export the functions in rpmsg_char.h.
> >>
> >> - Suppress the dependency with the rpmsg_ctrldev struct in the
> >> rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev function.
> >>
> >> - The rpmsg class is provided as parameter in rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev,
> >> because the class is associated to the control part.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 19 +++++++++------
> >> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.h | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.h
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> >> index 2bebc9b2d163..b9df8dc4365f 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> >> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> >> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> /*
> >> + * Copyright (C) 2021, STMicroelectronics
> >> * Copyright (c) 2016, Linaro Ltd.
> >> * Copyright (c) 2012, Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
> >> * Copyright (c) 2012, PetaLogix
> >> @@ -22,6 +23,7 @@
> >> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> >> #include <uapi/linux/rpmsg.h>
> >>
> >> +#include "rpmsg_char.h"
> >> #include "rpmsg_internal.h"
> >>
> >> #define RPMSG_DEV_MAX (MINORMASK + 1)
> >> @@ -78,7 +80,7 @@ struct rpmsg_eptdev {
> >> wait_queue_head_t readq;
> >> };
> >>
> >> -static int rpmsg_eptdev_destroy(struct device *dev, void *data)
> >> +int rpmsg_chrdev_destroy_eptdev(struct device *dev, void *data)
> >
> > Shouldn't this be rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_destroy()? I've been wondering about the
> > flipping of destroy and eptdev... The same for rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev().
>
> As the function is exported i prefered to follow name srtructure that is
> commonly used: <module>_<action>_<object>
>
> But it is not a rule, so please just tell me if you prefer that i rename the
> functions rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_xxxx?
I'd prefer rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_create/destroy() since we are already familiar
with that terminology.
>
> Thanks,
> Arnaud
>
> >
> > With that:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> >
> >> {
> >> struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev = dev_to_eptdev(dev);
> >>
> >> @@ -97,6 +99,7 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_destroy(struct device *dev, void *data)
> >>
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_chrdev_destroy_eptdev);
> >>
> >> static int rpmsg_ept_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *buf, int len,
> >> void *priv, u32 addr)
> >> @@ -280,7 +283,7 @@ static long rpmsg_eptdev_ioctl(struct file *fp, unsigned int cmd,
> >> if (cmd != RPMSG_DESTROY_EPT_IOCTL)
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >>
> >> - return rpmsg_eptdev_destroy(&eptdev->dev, NULL);
> >> + return rpmsg_chrdev_destroy_eptdev(&eptdev->dev, NULL);
> >> }
> >>
> >> static const struct file_operations rpmsg_eptdev_fops = {
> >> @@ -339,10 +342,9 @@ static void rpmsg_eptdev_release_device(struct device *dev)
> >> kfree(eptdev);
> >> }
> >>
> >> -static int rpmsg_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_ctrldev *ctrldev,
> >> - struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo)
> >> +int rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *parent,
> >> + struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo, struct class *rpmsg_class)
> >> {
> >> - struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = ctrldev->rpdev;
> >> struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev;
> >> struct device *dev;
> >> int ret;
> >> @@ -362,7 +364,7 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_ctrldev *ctrldev,
> >>
> >> device_initialize(dev);
> >> dev->class = rpmsg_class;
> >> - dev->parent = &ctrldev->dev;
> >> + dev->parent = parent;
> >> dev->groups = rpmsg_eptdev_groups;
> >> dev_set_drvdata(dev, eptdev);
> >>
> >> @@ -405,6 +407,7 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_ctrldev *ctrldev,
> >>
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev);
> >>
> >> static int rpmsg_ctrldev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> >> {
> >> @@ -444,7 +447,7 @@ static long rpmsg_ctrldev_ioctl(struct file *fp, unsigned int cmd,
> >> chinfo.src = eptinfo.src;
> >> chinfo.dst = eptinfo.dst;
> >>
> >> - return rpmsg_eptdev_create(ctrldev, chinfo);
> >> + return rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev(ctrldev->rpdev, &ctrldev->dev, chinfo, rpmsg_class);
> >> };
> >>
> >> static const struct file_operations rpmsg_ctrldev_fops = {
> >> @@ -530,7 +533,7 @@ static void rpmsg_chrdev_remove(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
> >> int ret;
> >>
> >> /* Destroy all endpoints */
> >> - ret = device_for_each_child(&ctrldev->dev, NULL, rpmsg_eptdev_destroy);
> >> + ret = device_for_each_child(&ctrldev->dev, NULL, rpmsg_chrdev_destroy_eptdev);
> >> if (ret)
> >> dev_warn(&rpdev->dev, "failed to nuke endpoints: %d\n", ret);
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.h b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.h
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..379d2ae2bee8
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.h
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
> >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */
> >> +/*
> >> + * Copyright (C) STMicroelectronics 2021.
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#ifndef __RPMSG_CHRDEV_H__
> >> +#define __RPMSG_CHRDEV_H__
> >> +
> >> +#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RPMSG_CHAR)
> >> +/**
> >> + * rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev() - register char device based on an endpoint
> >> + * @rpdev: prepared rpdev to be used for creating endpoints
> >> + * @parent: parent device
> >> + * @chinfo: assiated endpoint channel information.
> >> + *
> >> + * This function create a new rpmsg char endpoint device to instantiate a new
> >> + * endpoint based on chinfo information.
> >> + */
> >> +int rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *parent,
> >> + struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo, struct class *rpmsg_class);
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> + * rpmsg_chrdev_destroy_eptdev() - destroy created char device endpoint.
> >> + * @data: private data associated to the endpoint device
> >> + *
> >> + * This function destroys a rpmsg char endpoint device created by the RPMSG_DESTROY_EPT_IOCTL
> >> + * control.
> >> + */
> >> +int rpmsg_chrdev_destroy_eptdev(struct device *dev, void *data);
> >> +
> >> +#else /*IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RPMSG_CHAR) */
> >> +
> >> +static inline int rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *parent,
> >> + struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo,
> >> + struct class *rpmsg_class)
> >> +{
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static inline int rpmsg_chrdev_destroy_eptdev(struct device *dev, void *data)
> >> +{
> >> + /* This shouldn't be possible */
> >> + WARN_ON(1);
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +#endif /*IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RPMSG_CHAR) */
> >> +
> >> +#endif /*__RPMSG_CHRDEV_H__ */
> >> --
> >> 2.17.1
> >>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists