linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3] bpf: Fix some invalid links in bpf_devel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210422190948.432c1cab@carbon>
Date:   Thu, 22 Apr 2021 19:09:48 +0200
From:   Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To:     Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
        brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3] bpf: Fix some invalid links in
 bpf_devel_QA.rst

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:15:40 +0200
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:36:00 +0800
> Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn> wrote:
> 
> > There exist some errors "404 Not Found" when I click the link
> > of "MAINTAINERS" [1], "samples/bpf/" [2] and "selftests" [3]
> > in the documentation "HOWTO interact with BPF subsystem" [4].  
> 
> The links work if you are browsing the document via GitHub:
>  https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst
> 
> But I'm fine with removing those links as the official doc is here:
>  https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.html

IMHO a V4 was not needed.  Let me make it clear by ACKing this patch.

Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer