lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.2104231302530.19649@eggly.anvils>
Date:   Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:     Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        William Kucharski <william.kucharski@...cle.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/filemap: fix mapping_seek_hole_data on THP &
 32-bit

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:22:51 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Apr 2021, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Andrew, I'd have just sent a -fix.patch to remove the unnecessary u64s,
> > > > but need to reword the commit message: so please replace yesterday's
> > > > mm-filemap-fix-mapping_seek_hole_data-on-thp-32-bit.patch
> > > > by this one - thanks.
> > > 
> > > Actually, I routinely update the base patch's changelog when queueing a -fix.
> > 
> > And thank you for that, but if there's time, I think we would still
> > prefer the final commit message to include corrections where Matthew
> > enlightened me (that "sign-extension" claim came from my confusion):
> 
> That's my point.  When I merge a -v2 as a -fix, I replace the v1
> patch's changelog with v2's changelog so everything works out after
> folding.

Oh, great, thanks: that was not clear to me, I feared you meant adding
"v2: remove unneeded u64 casts" to v1 when merging.

Hugh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ