[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3323e5c0-cd52-528a-6a57-5982db05a4bf@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 11:37:05 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: 李扬韬 <frank.li@...o.com>
CC: <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, <chao@...nel.org>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: set prefree as free segments after clear
prefree segments
Hi Yangtao,
On 2021/4/23 10:40, 李扬韬 wrote:
> HI Chao,
>
>>> For now, when do_checkpoint fails, the prefree bitmap is not cleared,
>>> but these segments are already in the free state. If these segments
>>> are used, the segments in use will be reset to the free state when
>>> f2fs_clear_prefree_segments is called next time.
>>>
>>> So move set_prefree_as_free_segments after clear_prefree_segments.
>>
>> That's not correct.
>>
>> /*
>> * Should call f2fs_clear_prefree_segments after checkpoint is done.
>> */
>> static void set_prefree_as_free_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>
>> Comments above set_prefree_as_free_segments() should have told you
>> the rule, otherwise if checkpoint failed, valid data in last valid
>> checkpoint could be corrupted after segment reuse.
Oh, it seems I misunderstood what the patch did, please ignore above
comments.
>
> For do_checkpoint sucess:
>
> f2fs_write_checkpoint
> ->f2fs_flush_sit_entries
> ->set_prefree_as_free_segments
> ->do_checkpoint
> ->f2fs_clear_prefree_segments
>
>
> Calling set_prefree_as_free_segments when do_checkpoint fails,
> seems to be incorrect. I think clear free bitmap should be after
> clear prefree bitmap.
>
> For do_checkpoint fail:
>
> f2fs_write_checkpoint
> ->f2fs_flush_sit_entries
> ->set_prefree_as_free_segments
> ->do_checkpoint
> ->f2fs_release_discard_addrs
>
> The prefree bitmap is not cleared, but free bitmap is cleared,which means
> we can use these segments that are marked as free. When the free segments
> is used, the next f2fs_clear_prefree_segments will mark prefree as free again,
> causing some problem.
Okay, I can understand that.
But the problem here is, after applying this patch, successful checkpoint
may record wrong free_segment value:
- f2fs_write_checkpoint
- f2fs_flush_sit_entries
- do_checkpoint
- ckpt->free_segment_count = cpu_to_le32(free_segments(sbi));
- f2fs_clear_prefree_segments
- __set_test_and_free
- free_i->free_segments++;
I guess for the case of do_checkpoint() fails, maybe we can reset
free segment to prefree status.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
>
> With this patch, for do_checkpoint fail:
>
> f2fs_write_checkpoint
> ->f2fs_flush_sit_entries
> ->do_checkpoint
> ->f2fs_release_discard_addrs
>
> At this time, we did not mark prefree as free segments, so these segments will not be used.
>
> Thx
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists