[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCv0x0vVzdtr=yezvHsq9TSx-nd76NiT2zYqQOuOa2W86VEqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 21:20:21 -0700
From: Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 12/14] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: reduce
unnecessary interrupts
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 9:26 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 21:09:12 -0700 Ilya Lipnitskiy wrote:
> > @@ -1551,8 +1551,9 @@ static int mtk_napi_rx(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> > remain_budget -= rx_done;
> > goto poll_again;
> > }
> > - napi_complete(napi);
> > - mtk_rx_irq_enable(eth, MTK_RX_DONE_INT);
> > +
> > + if (napi_complete(napi))
> > + mtk_rx_irq_enable(eth, MTK_RX_DONE_INT);
>
> Why not napi_complete_done(napi, rx_done + budget - remain_budget)?
> (Modulo possible elimination of rx_done in this function.)
No reason, I think. Thanks for pointing it out. I will clean up both
TX and RX NAPI callbacks to use napi_complete_done and to get rid of
that ugly goto...
Ilya
Powered by blists - more mailing lists